This study investigates the influence of two surfactants –a non-ionic (Tween20) and a zwitterionic (Cocoamidopropyl Betaine) – upon the gas-liquid hydrodynamics in a bubble column. These kinds of substances can have an important influence upon the gas-liquid hydrodynamics, specifically on the bubble size and gas hold-up. Bubble diameters were measured photographically in a bubble column, which was operating in the homogeneous regime with air and aqueous surfactant solutions. The bubble size and gas hold-up data were determined for several values of the superficial gas velocity (0.13, 0.26 and 0.5 cm/s). On the other hand, bubble diameter was determined for different values of surfactant concentration (0.02, 0.05 and 0.1 %vol). At superficial gas velocity below 0.26 cm/s, addition of surfactant in air-water has low influence on bubble size, whereas higher gas velocity addition of surfactant increases the number of bubble. In surfactant solutions (in comparison with pour water), resulted in an increase in number of bubble and a rough decrease in Sauter mean bubble diameter. Bubbles tend to become smaller with decreasing surface tension of water. Therefore, surfactant existence increases the gas hold-up. Further, gas holdup increased when gas bubbles movement increased.
Published in | American Journal of Chemical Engineering (Volume 1, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajche.20130102.14 |
Page(s) | 50-58 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2013. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Bubble Column, Surfactant, Bubble Size, Gas Hold-Up
[1] | Akita, K., Yoshida, F., 1973, Gas Holdup and Volumetric Mass Transfer Coefficient in Bubble Column. Effect of Liquid Properties, Ind Eng Chem Process Res,12,76-80. |
[2] | Akita, K., Yoshida, F., 1974. Bubble size, interfacial area and liquid-phase mass transfer coefficient in bubble columns. Ind Eng Chem Process, 12, 76–80. |
[3] | Al-Masry, W. A., Ali, E. M., 2007. Identification of hydrodynamics characteristics in bubble columns through analysis of acoustic sound measurements-Influence of the liquid phase properties. Chem Eng Processing 46, 127-138. |
[4] | Al-Masry, W. A., Ali, E. M., Aqeel, Y. M., 2005. Determination of bubble characteristics in bubble columns using statistical analysis of acoustic sound measurements. Chem Eng Research and Design 83, 1196-1207. |
[5] | Anastasiou, A. D., Kazakis, N. A., Mouza, A. A., Paras, S. V., 2010. Effect of organic surfactant additives on gas holdup in the pseudo-homogeneous regime in bubble columns equipped with fine pore sparger. Chem Eng Sci, 65, 5872-5880. |
[6] | Asgharpour, M., Mehrnia, M. R., Mostoufi, N., 2010. Effect of surface contaminants on oxygen transfer in bubble column reactors. Biochem Eng Jour, 49, 351-360. |
[7] | Boauifi, M., Hebrard, G., Bastoul, D., Roustan, M., 2001. A comparative study of gas hold-up, bubble size, interfacial area and mass transfer coefficients in stirred gas–liquid reactor and bubble columns. Chem. Eng. Process. 40, 97-111. |
[8] | Cachaza, E.M., Di´az, M.E., Montes, F.J., and M.A. Gala´n, M.A., 2009. Simultaneous computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation of the hydrodynamics and mass transfer in a partially aerated bubble column. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Res., 48(18): 8685-869. |
[9] | Chisti, Y., Moo-Young, M., 1988, Hydrodynamics and oxygen mass transfer in a pneumatic bioreactor devices, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 3, 1487–1494. |
[10] | Choi, K. H., Lee, W. K., 1993. Circulation liquid velocity, gas holdup and volumetric oxygen transfer coefficient in external-loop airlift reactors. , J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnol. 56, 51-58. |
[11] | Deckwer, W.D., 1992. Bubble Column Reactors. Wiley, Chichester. |
[12] | Garcia, A, A., Diaz, G., Navaza, J. M., Sanjurjo, B., 2010. Effect of surfactant nature upon absorption in a bubble column. Chem Eng Sci, 65, 4484-4490. |
[13] | Garcia, A, A., Diaz, G., Navaza, J. M., Vidal-Tato, I., 2011. Hydrodynamics of a carbom dioxide/water/silicone oil bubble column. Chem Eng Jour, 171, 1108-1113. |
[14] | Garcia-Abuin, A., Gomez-Diaz, D., Losada, M., Navaza, J. M., 2012. Bubble column gas-liquid interfacial area in a polymer + surfactant + water system. Chem Eng Sci, 75, 334-341. |
[15] | Joshi, J.B., Parasu Veera, U., Prasad, C.V., Phanikumar, D.V., Deshphande, N.S., Thakre, S.S., Thorat, B.N., 1998. Gas hold-up structure in bubble column reactors. PINSA 64A (4), 441–567. |
[16] | Kalekar, M.S., Bhagwat, S, S., 2006. Dynamic behavior of surfactants in solution. Journal of Dispersion Sci and Technol., 27(7): 1027-1034. |
[17] | Kothekar, S.H.C., Ware, A.M., Waghmare, J.T., Momin, S.A., 2007. Comparative analysis of the properties of Tween-20, Tween-60, Tween-80, Arlacel60 and Arlacel-80. Journal of Dispersion Sci and Technol., 28(3): 477-484. |
[18] | Krishna, R., VanBaten, J.M., 2003. Mass transfer in bubble columns. Catal Today, 79–80,67–75. |
[19] | Kulkarni, A. A., Joshi, J. B., 2005. Bubble formation and bubble rise velocity in gas–liquid system: a review. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44, 5873-5931. |
[20] | Nigar, K., Fahir, B., Kutlu, O. U., 2005. Bubble column reactors: A review. Process Biochemistry 40, 2263-2283. |
[21] | Porter, M.R., 1994. Hand book of Surfactants, Blackie, London. |
[22] | Prince,M. J., Blanch, H. W., 1990. Bubble coalescence and break-up in air-sparged bubble column. AIChE. 36, 1485-1499. |
[23] | Ribeiro, C.P., Lage, P.L.C., 2005. Gas–liquid direct-contact evaporation: a review. Chem Eng & Tech, 28 (10), 1081–1107. |
[24] | Ruzicka, M. C., Vecer, M. M., Orvalho, S., Drahoš, J., 2008, Effect of surfactant on homogeneous regime stability in bubble column, Chem Eng Sci, 63 ,951 – 967. |
[25] | Sardeing, R., Painmanakul, P., Hébrard. G., 2006. Effect of surfactants on liquid-side mass transfer coefficients in gas–liquid systems: A first step to modeling. Chem Eng Sci., 61(19): 6249-6260. |
[26] | Shaw, D., 1992. Surface activity and micelle formation. Modified by T. Corcoran. |
[27] | Yang, Y.M., Maa, J.R., 1984, Bubble coalescence in dilute surfactant solution. Journal of Colloid and Interface Sci 98, 120–125. |
[28] | Zaruba, A., Krepper, E., Prasser, H. M., Schleicher, E., 2005, Measurment of Bubble Velocity Profiles and Turbulent Diffusion Coefficients of the Gases Phase in Rectangular Bubble Column Using Image Processing, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Sci ,29,851-860. |
APA Style
Maedeh Asari, Faramarz Hormozi. (2013). Effects of Surfactant on Bubble Size Distribution and Gas Hold-up in a Bubble Column. American Journal of Chemical Engineering, 1(2), 50-58. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajche.20130102.14
ACS Style
Maedeh Asari; Faramarz Hormozi. Effects of Surfactant on Bubble Size Distribution and Gas Hold-up in a Bubble Column. Am. J. Chem. Eng. 2013, 1(2), 50-58. doi: 10.11648/j.ajche.20130102.14
AMA Style
Maedeh Asari, Faramarz Hormozi. Effects of Surfactant on Bubble Size Distribution and Gas Hold-up in a Bubble Column. Am J Chem Eng. 2013;1(2):50-58. doi: 10.11648/j.ajche.20130102.14
@article{10.11648/j.ajche.20130102.14, author = {Maedeh Asari and Faramarz Hormozi}, title = {Effects of Surfactant on Bubble Size Distribution and Gas Hold-up in a Bubble Column}, journal = {American Journal of Chemical Engineering}, volume = {1}, number = {2}, pages = {50-58}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajche.20130102.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajche.20130102.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajche.20130102.14}, abstract = {This study investigates the influence of two surfactants –a non-ionic (Tween20) and a zwitterionic (Cocoamidopropyl Betaine) – upon the gas-liquid hydrodynamics in a bubble column. These kinds of substances can have an important influence upon the gas-liquid hydrodynamics, specifically on the bubble size and gas hold-up. Bubble diameters were measured photographically in a bubble column, which was operating in the homogeneous regime with air and aqueous surfactant solutions. The bubble size and gas hold-up data were determined for several values of the superficial gas velocity (0.13, 0.26 and 0.5 cm/s). On the other hand, bubble diameter was determined for different values of surfactant concentration (0.02, 0.05 and 0.1 %vol). At superficial gas velocity below 0.26 cm/s, addition of surfactant in air-water has low influence on bubble size, whereas higher gas velocity addition of surfactant increases the number of bubble. In surfactant solutions (in comparison with pour water), resulted in an increase in number of bubble and a rough decrease in Sauter mean bubble diameter. Bubbles tend to become smaller with decreasing surface tension of water. Therefore, surfactant existence increases the gas hold-up. Further, gas holdup increased when gas bubbles movement increased.}, year = {2013} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Effects of Surfactant on Bubble Size Distribution and Gas Hold-up in a Bubble Column AU - Maedeh Asari AU - Faramarz Hormozi Y1 - 2013/07/20 PY - 2013 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajche.20130102.14 DO - 10.11648/j.ajche.20130102.14 T2 - American Journal of Chemical Engineering JF - American Journal of Chemical Engineering JO - American Journal of Chemical Engineering SP - 50 EP - 58 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8613 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajche.20130102.14 AB - This study investigates the influence of two surfactants –a non-ionic (Tween20) and a zwitterionic (Cocoamidopropyl Betaine) – upon the gas-liquid hydrodynamics in a bubble column. These kinds of substances can have an important influence upon the gas-liquid hydrodynamics, specifically on the bubble size and gas hold-up. Bubble diameters were measured photographically in a bubble column, which was operating in the homogeneous regime with air and aqueous surfactant solutions. The bubble size and gas hold-up data were determined for several values of the superficial gas velocity (0.13, 0.26 and 0.5 cm/s). On the other hand, bubble diameter was determined for different values of surfactant concentration (0.02, 0.05 and 0.1 %vol). At superficial gas velocity below 0.26 cm/s, addition of surfactant in air-water has low influence on bubble size, whereas higher gas velocity addition of surfactant increases the number of bubble. In surfactant solutions (in comparison with pour water), resulted in an increase in number of bubble and a rough decrease in Sauter mean bubble diameter. Bubbles tend to become smaller with decreasing surface tension of water. Therefore, surfactant existence increases the gas hold-up. Further, gas holdup increased when gas bubbles movement increased. VL - 1 IS - 2 ER -