Arsenic, one of the elements having most terrible impact on the human being, is threatening the world continuously. It exists in the combined form in rocks under earth which on dissolution contaminates ground water. By various mean, such as industrial activities, it can enter into vital ecological cycle and cause hazards to human health. In the previous paper, it is shown that use of activated carbons such as BACI-2017 can assist in removing As (III) at highest level of 455 mg/g from contaminated water. In this study, the removal of arsenic (III) is compared when different level of nano iron oxides are present. In order to determine the optimal extraction of As (III) in presence of nano iron oxide solutions containing different arsenic concentrations, 5 to 400 mg/l with nano iron particles of 0.5 to 0.1g have been used. BACI-2017 with particle sizes, mesh 4x8 and 100 or higher been also employed. The separation of As (III) was carried out using 0.1 gram of BACI-2017. The maximum As (III) extraction in presence of nano iron oxide and combined nano iron oxide with BACI-2017 are shown to be 19.47 mg/g and 99.36 mg/g respectively during 15 minutes contact times.
Published in | International Journal of Computational and Theoretical Chemistry (Volume 6, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijctc.20180601.13 |
Page(s) | 21-27 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2018. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Nanotechnology, Separation, As (III), Iron Nano Oxide, BACI-2017
[1] | Sharf Ilahi Siddiqui, Iron oxide and its modified forms as an adsorbent for arsenic removal: A comprehensive recent advancement, October 2017Volume 111, Pages 592–626 Journal of Biomechanics, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.08.009. |
[2] | N. Akartasse et. al. Natural product based composite for extraction of arsenic (III) from waste water, Chemistry Central Journal (2017) 11:33 DOI 10.1186/s13065-017-0261-9. |
[3] | Bringas E, Saiz J, Ortiz, Removal of As (V) from groundwater using functionalized magnetic adsorbent materials: efects of competing ions. Sep Purif Technol 156:699–707 (2015). |
[4] | Qasim, Syed R, Water Engineering (Planning, Design, Utilization), Volume I and II, Third edition, Hafiz publishing, 2013, pp. 9-32 (Vol. 1), Pages 335-334 (Vol. II). |
[5] | Christine Marie Georae, Laura Sima. M Helena Jahuira Arias, Jana Mihalic, Lilia Z Cabrera, David Danz, William Checkley & Robert H Gilman.'' Arsenic exposure in drinking Water: an recognized health threat in peru" Accepted: 22 January 2014. |
[6] | [Nina Ricci Nicomel, Karen Leus, Karel Folens, pascal VanDer Veort and Gijs Du Laing. "Technologies for Arsenic Removal from water: current status and future perspectives" Accepted: 17 December 2015. |
[7] | H. Ghafourian, M. Rabbani, Z. Ghazanfari, Novel Carbon Porous Material with Nanostructural for Separation of arsenic (III) from Water with Highest Adsorption Capacity International Journal of Environmental Chemistry Volume 2, Issue 2, March 2017, Pages: 27-30 779May 24, 2017. |
[8] | Esmaeli, Akbar, Naghizadeh, Sedigheh ‘’Biological absorption of lead in milk by an orange peel absorbent with alkaline correction, Journal of Food Science and Technology’’ Feb. 20, 2011, pp. 81 and 82. |
[9] | Farzinius, W. Water Analysis, Towayipour, Ahmad, Second Edition, Arak University, Summer 2013, pp. 154-148. |
[10] | Tavakoli Mohammadi, Mohammad Reza, Pertani, Sadegh, Marzban, Mehdi, Sources of heavy metal contamination in Zanjan province using GIS, Proceedings of the Siamese Geosciences Conference, 1st to 3rd March 2011. |
APA Style
Hossein Ghafourian, Mohammad Rabbani, Zahra Ghazanfari. (2018). Comparison of As (III) Adsorption Capacity in Aqueous Solution with Iron Nano Oxide and Nano Absorber BACI-2017. International Journal of Computational and Theoretical Chemistry, 6(1), 21-27. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijctc.20180601.13
ACS Style
Hossein Ghafourian; Mohammad Rabbani; Zahra Ghazanfari. Comparison of As (III) Adsorption Capacity in Aqueous Solution with Iron Nano Oxide and Nano Absorber BACI-2017. Int. J. Comput. Theor. Chem. 2018, 6(1), 21-27. doi: 10.11648/j.ijctc.20180601.13
AMA Style
Hossein Ghafourian, Mohammad Rabbani, Zahra Ghazanfari. Comparison of As (III) Adsorption Capacity in Aqueous Solution with Iron Nano Oxide and Nano Absorber BACI-2017. Int J Comput Theor Chem. 2018;6(1):21-27. doi: 10.11648/j.ijctc.20180601.13
@article{10.11648/j.ijctc.20180601.13, author = {Hossein Ghafourian and Mohammad Rabbani and Zahra Ghazanfari}, title = {Comparison of As (III) Adsorption Capacity in Aqueous Solution with Iron Nano Oxide and Nano Absorber BACI-2017}, journal = {International Journal of Computational and Theoretical Chemistry}, volume = {6}, number = {1}, pages = {21-27}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijctc.20180601.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijctc.20180601.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijctc.20180601.13}, abstract = {Arsenic, one of the elements having most terrible impact on the human being, is threatening the world continuously. It exists in the combined form in rocks under earth which on dissolution contaminates ground water. By various mean, such as industrial activities, it can enter into vital ecological cycle and cause hazards to human health. In the previous paper, it is shown that use of activated carbons such as BACI-2017 can assist in removing As (III) at highest level of 455 mg/g from contaminated water. In this study, the removal of arsenic (III) is compared when different level of nano iron oxides are present. In order to determine the optimal extraction of As (III) in presence of nano iron oxide solutions containing different arsenic concentrations, 5 to 400 mg/l with nano iron particles of 0.5 to 0.1g have been used. BACI-2017 with particle sizes, mesh 4x8 and 100 or higher been also employed. The separation of As (III) was carried out using 0.1 gram of BACI-2017. The maximum As (III) extraction in presence of nano iron oxide and combined nano iron oxide with BACI-2017 are shown to be 19.47 mg/g and 99.36 mg/g respectively during 15 minutes contact times.}, year = {2018} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Comparison of As (III) Adsorption Capacity in Aqueous Solution with Iron Nano Oxide and Nano Absorber BACI-2017 AU - Hossein Ghafourian AU - Mohammad Rabbani AU - Zahra Ghazanfari Y1 - 2018/01/26 PY - 2018 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijctc.20180601.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ijctc.20180601.13 T2 - International Journal of Computational and Theoretical Chemistry JF - International Journal of Computational and Theoretical Chemistry JO - International Journal of Computational and Theoretical Chemistry SP - 21 EP - 27 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-7308 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijctc.20180601.13 AB - Arsenic, one of the elements having most terrible impact on the human being, is threatening the world continuously. It exists in the combined form in rocks under earth which on dissolution contaminates ground water. By various mean, such as industrial activities, it can enter into vital ecological cycle and cause hazards to human health. In the previous paper, it is shown that use of activated carbons such as BACI-2017 can assist in removing As (III) at highest level of 455 mg/g from contaminated water. In this study, the removal of arsenic (III) is compared when different level of nano iron oxides are present. In order to determine the optimal extraction of As (III) in presence of nano iron oxide solutions containing different arsenic concentrations, 5 to 400 mg/l with nano iron particles of 0.5 to 0.1g have been used. BACI-2017 with particle sizes, mesh 4x8 and 100 or higher been also employed. The separation of As (III) was carried out using 0.1 gram of BACI-2017. The maximum As (III) extraction in presence of nano iron oxide and combined nano iron oxide with BACI-2017 are shown to be 19.47 mg/g and 99.36 mg/g respectively during 15 minutes contact times. VL - 6 IS - 1 ER -