In the current research work reinforcement of a thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) polymer with graphene powder (G, in the form of particles) as a nanofiller material by in-situ and ex-situ mixing of various weight fractions of G is reported. In addition, investigation on the effect of the weight fraction of G on the mechanical properties of the resulting TPU/graphene (TPU/G) nanocomposites is conducted. A number of different preparation methods have been employed in order to investigate the influence of the preparation process on the resulting TPU/G nanocomposites. Solvent (wet) mixing and mechanical (dry) mixing processes have been used. Significant enhancement in compressive strength, melt flow index and electrical conductivity were observed by employing the different mixing processes when compared with the pure TPU polymer processed under similar conditions. However, dry mixing process has shown enhanced mechanical, viscosity and electrical properties compared to wet mixing process. Moreover, dry mixing process has led to the formation of TPU/G nanocomposites with the highest compressive strength at 0.1 wt% G compared with 0.5, and 1 wt % G. It is believed that the processing technique plays a vital role in producing the desired TPU/G nanocomposites and is also affected by the dispersion of graphene nanofiller particles within the TPU polymer matrix. These results may lead to the development of novel applications of TPU/G nanocomposites across different disciplines.
Published in | American Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (Volume 1, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.nano.20130101.17 |
Page(s) | 31-40 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2013. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Polymer Nanocomposites, Graphene, TPU, Conductivity
[1] | J. L. Vickery, A. J. Patil, S. Mann, "Fabrication of graphene–polymer nanocomposites with higher-order three-dimensional architectures" Adv. Mater., Vol 21, 2180–2184, 2009. |
[2] | H. Kim, A. A. Abdala, and C. W. Macosko, "Graphene/Polymer Nanocomposites" Macromolecules, Vol43, pp 6515–6530, 2010 |
[3] | C. N. R. Rao, A. K. Sood, R. Voggu, and K. S. Subrahmanyam. "Some Novel Attributes of Graphene" J. Phys. Chem. Lett. ,Vol 1, pp 572–580, 2010. |
[4] | K. B. Carey, T. Jerome, and S. Karna, "Carbon Nanotube Aluminum Matrix Nanocomposites’’ Weapons and Materials Research Directorate, Army Research Laboratory, Vol 1, 2010. |
[5] | M. J. Allen, V. C. Tung, and R. B. Kaner, "Honeycomb Carbon: A Review of Graphene" Chem. Rev. Vol 110, pp 132–145, 2010 |
[6] | K. T. Lau, ‘‘Recent Research in Nanotube/Nanoclay Related Polymer Composites’’ Twelve International Conference on Composites/Nano engineering, ICCE-12, Tenerife, Spain, August 2005 |
[7] | N.A. Ochekpe, O. Patrick, and C.N. Wuluka,"Nanotechnology and Drug Delivery. Part 1: Background and Applications’’ Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, pp.265-274, 2009. |
[8] | D. Xiao, X. Zhao, Y. Feng, and P. Xiang, W. Zhang, ‘The structure and dynamic properties of thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer/ hindered phenol hybrids’’ Journal of Applied Polymer Science ,pp. 2143-2150 ,2010 |
[9] | A.V. Pinheiro, D. Han, W.M. Shih, and H.Yan, ‘’Challenges and opportunities for structural DNA nanotechnology’’ Nature Nanotechnology, Vol.6, pp. 763-772, 2011. |
[10] | J. Bergstrom, and M.C. Boyce, ’’ Mechanical behavior of particle filled elastomers.’’ Mech. Phys. Solids, in press. |
[11] | M. Aurilia, F. Piscitelli, L. Sorrentino, and M. Lavorgna, ’’ Detailed analysis of dynamic mechanical properties of TPU nanocomposite: The role of the interfaces’’. European Polymer Journal, Vol. 47, pp. 925 -936, 2011. |
[12] | Y. Wang, Z. Shi, J. Fang, H. Xu, and J. Yin, ’’Graphene oxide/polybenzimidazole composites fabricated by a solvent-exchange method’’ Carbon, Vol. 49, pp.1199-1207, 2011. |
[13] | A.M. Esawi, H.G. Salem, H.Hussein, and A. Ramadan, "Effect of Processing Technique on the Dispersion of Carbon Nanotubes Within Polypropylene Carbon Nanotube-Nanocomposites and Its Effect on Their Mechanical Properties’’ Polymer Composites, Vol. 31, pp.772, 2009. |
[14] | E.W. Gacitua, A.B. Ballerini and J. Zhang, "Polymer nanocomposites: synthetic and natural fillers a review’’ Maderas.Ciencia y tecnologia,Vol. 13, pp.159-178,2005. |
[15] | Y. Jichun, Q.H. Bing, L. Zonghoon, A. Byungmin, R.Steve, and J. M. Schoenun, "A tri-modal aluminum based composite with super-high strength." Scripta Materialia,Vol. 53, pp.481-486, 2005. |
[16] | E. Ionescu, A.Francis, R. J. Riedel, ’’Dispersion assessment and studies on AC percolative conductivity in polymer-derived Si–C–N/CNT ceramic nanocomposites’’ Material Science, Vol. 44, pp. 2055-2062, 2009 |
[17] | H. Quan, B. Zhang, Q. Zhao, K. Richard, K. Yuen, and K. Y. Robert , ’’ Facile preparation and thermal degradation studies of graphite nanoplatelets(GNPs) filled thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) nanonanocomposites" Nanocomposites; Part A ,Vol. 40,pp. 1506-1511 ,2004. |
[18] | A. K Barick, and D.K.Tripathy, ’’ Effect of nanofiber on material properties of vapor-grown carbon nanofiber reinforced thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU/CNF) nanocomposites prepared by melt compounding’’ Nanocomposites; Part A ,Vol. 41, pp.1471-1482,2010 |
[19] | T.M. Madkour, T. M and F.M. Hagag, W. Mamdouh, and R.A. Azzam, ’’ A Nanoscale Molecular-level modeling and experimental investigation into the high performance nature and low hysteresis of thermoplastic polyurethane/multi-walled carbon nanotubes nanocomposites Polymer,Vol. 53, pp.5788-5797,2012 |
[20] | Z. Spitalsky, D.Tasis, K. Papagelis, and C.J. Galiotis Carbon nanotube–polymer composites: Chemistry, processing, mechanical and electrical properties’’. .Poly. Sci, Vol. 35, pp.357-401, 2010. |
[21] | D6641 ASTM standard test method for compressive properties of polymer matrix composites; Pennsylvania; ASTM international. |
[22] | E. Thostenson, "Advances in the Science and Technology of Carbon Nanotubes and their Nanocomposites: A Review." Nanocomposites Science and Technology, Vol. 61, pp.1899-1912, 2001. |
[23] | N. Jing, Q. Xue, C.Ling, M. Shan, T. Zhang, X. Zhou, and Jiao, ’’Effect of defects on Young's modulus of graphene sheets: a molecular dynamics simulation ‘RSC Adv., Vol.2, pp.9124-9129, 2012. |
[24] | J. M. Cowie, and V.Arrighi, Polymers: Chemistry and Physics of modern materials. 3 rd ed., CRC Press, 2008.. |
[25] | B. Lin, U. Sundararaj, and P.Guegan, ’’ Effect of mixing protocol on compatibilized polymer blend morphology’’ Polymer Engineering and Science ,Vol. 46,pp. 691-702,2006. |
[26] | A. Funck, "Polypropylene Carbon Nanotube Nanocomposites by in Situ Polymerization." Nanocomposites Science and Technology, Vol. 67, pp.906-915, 2007. |
[27] | A.L. Valentini, "Morphological Characterization of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes-Nanocomposites." Nanocomposites Science and Technology, Vol. 63, pp 1149-1153, 2003. |
[28] | S. Archana, S. Patole, H. Kang, J. Yoo, T. Kim, J. Ahn, Col, "A facile approach to the fabrication of graphene/polystyrene nanocomposite by in situ microemulsion polymerization’’ Inter. Sci. ,Vol. 350,pp.530-533 , 2010 |
[29] | C. Nan, Y. Shen, and J.Ma, "Physical Properties of Nanocomposites near Percolation" Annu. Rev. Mater. Res.,Vol. 40, pp.131-151, 2010. |
[30] | Li, Q., Dunn, E.T., Grandmaison, E. W. and Goosen, M.F.A. "Application and Properties of Chitosan" J. Bioact. Compat. Polym., Vol7,pp. 370-397,1992 |
APA Style
Irene S. Fahim, Wael Mamdouh, Hanadi A. G. Salem. (2013). A Nanoscale Investigation of Mechanical, Thermal Stability and Electrical Conductivity Properties of Reinforced Thermoplastic Polyurethane/Graphene Nanocomposite. American Journal of Nano Research and Applications, 1(1), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.nano.20130101.17
ACS Style
Irene S. Fahim; Wael Mamdouh; Hanadi A. G. Salem. A Nanoscale Investigation of Mechanical, Thermal Stability and Electrical Conductivity Properties of Reinforced Thermoplastic Polyurethane/Graphene Nanocomposite. Am. J. Nano Res. Appl. 2013, 1(1), 31-40. doi: 10.11648/j.nano.20130101.17
AMA Style
Irene S. Fahim, Wael Mamdouh, Hanadi A. G. Salem. A Nanoscale Investigation of Mechanical, Thermal Stability and Electrical Conductivity Properties of Reinforced Thermoplastic Polyurethane/Graphene Nanocomposite. Am J Nano Res Appl. 2013;1(1):31-40. doi: 10.11648/j.nano.20130101.17
@article{10.11648/j.nano.20130101.17, author = {Irene S. Fahim and Wael Mamdouh and Hanadi A. G. Salem}, title = {A Nanoscale Investigation of Mechanical, Thermal Stability and Electrical Conductivity Properties of Reinforced Thermoplastic Polyurethane/Graphene Nanocomposite}, journal = {American Journal of Nano Research and Applications}, volume = {1}, number = {1}, pages = {31-40}, doi = {10.11648/j.nano.20130101.17}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.nano.20130101.17}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.nano.20130101.17}, abstract = {In the current research work reinforcement of a thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) polymer with graphene powder (G, in the form of particles) as a nanofiller material by in-situ and ex-situ mixing of various weight fractions of G is reported. In addition, investigation on the effect of the weight fraction of G on the mechanical properties of the resulting TPU/graphene (TPU/G) nanocomposites is conducted. A number of different preparation methods have been employed in order to investigate the influence of the preparation process on the resulting TPU/G nanocomposites. Solvent (wet) mixing and mechanical (dry) mixing processes have been used. Significant enhancement in compressive strength, melt flow index and electrical conductivity were observed by employing the different mixing processes when compared with the pure TPU polymer processed under similar conditions. However, dry mixing process has shown enhanced mechanical, viscosity and electrical properties compared to wet mixing process. Moreover, dry mixing process has led to the formation of TPU/G nanocomposites with the highest compressive strength at 0.1 wt% G compared with 0.5, and 1 wt % G. It is believed that the processing technique plays a vital role in producing the desired TPU/G nanocomposites and is also affected by the dispersion of graphene nanofiller particles within the TPU polymer matrix. These results may lead to the development of novel applications of TPU/G nanocomposites across different disciplines.}, year = {2013} }
TY - JOUR T1 - A Nanoscale Investigation of Mechanical, Thermal Stability and Electrical Conductivity Properties of Reinforced Thermoplastic Polyurethane/Graphene Nanocomposite AU - Irene S. Fahim AU - Wael Mamdouh AU - Hanadi A. G. Salem Y1 - 2013/06/10 PY - 2013 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.nano.20130101.17 DO - 10.11648/j.nano.20130101.17 T2 - American Journal of Nano Research and Applications JF - American Journal of Nano Research and Applications JO - American Journal of Nano Research and Applications SP - 31 EP - 40 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-3738 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.nano.20130101.17 AB - In the current research work reinforcement of a thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) polymer with graphene powder (G, in the form of particles) as a nanofiller material by in-situ and ex-situ mixing of various weight fractions of G is reported. In addition, investigation on the effect of the weight fraction of G on the mechanical properties of the resulting TPU/graphene (TPU/G) nanocomposites is conducted. A number of different preparation methods have been employed in order to investigate the influence of the preparation process on the resulting TPU/G nanocomposites. Solvent (wet) mixing and mechanical (dry) mixing processes have been used. Significant enhancement in compressive strength, melt flow index and electrical conductivity were observed by employing the different mixing processes when compared with the pure TPU polymer processed under similar conditions. However, dry mixing process has shown enhanced mechanical, viscosity and electrical properties compared to wet mixing process. Moreover, dry mixing process has led to the formation of TPU/G nanocomposites with the highest compressive strength at 0.1 wt% G compared with 0.5, and 1 wt % G. It is believed that the processing technique plays a vital role in producing the desired TPU/G nanocomposites and is also affected by the dispersion of graphene nanofiller particles within the TPU polymer matrix. These results may lead to the development of novel applications of TPU/G nanocomposites across different disciplines. VL - 1 IS - 1 ER -