Homegardens are one of the most complex and diverse agroforestry systems worldwide and played an important role towards the development of early agriculture and domestication of crops and fruit trees. The study was conducted with an objective of investigating the role of homegardens for improved livelihoods and food security in Dilla Zuriya Woreda. Simple random sampling was used to obtain a study population of 120 households, to whom an interview schedule and an observation checklist was used. The average size of the homegardens of the study area ranges from 250m2 (small) to 2000m2 (large) with mean of 665.42m2. The Shannon Weaver indices of plant species in Chichu, Golla, Bulla and Shigedo homegarden were H’=3.52, H’=3.46, H’=3.34 and H’=3.37 respectively. The dominance index also shows that only a few species dominated the homegardens in Bulla (l=0.056) as compared to Chichu (l=0.048), Golla (l=0.052) and Shigedo (l=0.054) homegardens. The evenness index shows that in Chichu homegardens most of the species are equally abundant (E = 0.45). In total, 75 different plant species with trees (44%), shrubs (20%), herbs (32%) and climbers (4%) were recorded under ten use categories. Of the identified species 40% were food crops, 17.3% were crops used for income, 13.3% were medicinal, 17.3% were plants used as live fence, 20% were used for building and fuel, 10.6% were used for home materials, 4% were used as spices, 5.3% were stimulants, 10.6% were used as ornamentals and 20% plant species were used for shading. The homegaden in the study area were highly diversified with different plant species that provide multiple use for the household.
Published in | Plant (Volume 3, Issue 6) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.plant.20150306.14 |
Page(s) | 80-86 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2016. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Homegarden, Diversity, Agroforesry
[1] | Chris L. L. 2011. Livelihoods Grow in Gardens. Diversification booklet number 2 (2nd edition). FAO, 2012. |
[2] | Nair PKR. 2006. Whither homegardens? Kumar B.M, Nair PKR, editors. Tropical homegardens: A time-tested example of sustainable agroforestry, pp. 355–370. Dordrecht: Springer Science. |
[3] | Abdoellah O. S, Hadikusumah H. Y, Takeuchi K, Satoru Okubo S and Parikesit. 2006 Commercialization of homegardens in an Indonesian village: vegetation composition and functional changes. Agroforestry Systems 68: 1–13. |
[4] | Vorgelegt Von. 2007. Rural Homegardens in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia: An Example for a Sustainable Agro-Ecosystem? Ph.D Dissertation, Georg-August-University. Göttingen. |
[5] | Helen Keller International/Asia-Pacific. 2010. Homestead food production model contributes to improved household food security, nutrition and female empowermentExperience from scaling-up programs in Asia (Bangladesh, Cambodia, Nepal and Philippines). Nutrition Bulletin Vol. 8 Issue 1. |
[6] | Marsh R. 1998. Building on Traditional Gardening to improve Household Food Security. Food Nutrition and Agriculture No. 20, Food and Agriculture Organization. |
[7] | Uddin M. B and Mukul S. A. 2004. Improving Forest Dependent Livelihoods through NTFPs and Home Gardens: A Case Study from Satchari National Park. |
[8] | Bashir Jama, Eyasu Elias and Kebadire Mogotsi. 2006. Role of agroforestry in improving food security and natural resource management in the drylands: a regional overview. Journal of the dry lands 1(2): 206-211. |
[9] | Tadesse Kippie. 2002. Five Thousand Years of Sustainablity? A Case study on Gedeo Land Use (Southern Ethiopia). Treemail publishers, Heelsum, Netherland. |
[10] | Tesfaye Abebe. 2005. Diversity in homegarden agroforestry systems in Southern Ethiopia. PhD thesis Wageningen University, Wageningen. |
[11] | Taye Kufa and J. Burkhardt. Physiological Growth Response in Seedlings of Arabica Coffee Genotypes under Contrasting Nursery Microenvironments. Plant. Vol. 3, No. 5, 2015, pp. 47-56. |
[12] | Midmore D. J, Niñez V, and Venkataraman R. 1991. Household gardening Projects in Asia: experience and future directions. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Technical Bulletin No. 19, 28 p. |
[13] | Bogale Teferi. 2007. The Map of Study Area. |
[14] | SPSS Inc. 2007. SPSS Version 16. SPSS Incl., Chicago, Illinois, USA. |
[15] | Shannon, C. E., and Wiener, W. 1949. The mathematical theory of Communication. Unversity of Illions Press. Urbana III. |
[16] | Olajide-Taiwo F. B, Adeoye I. B, Adebisi-Adelani O, Odeleye O. M. O, Fabiyi A. O and Olajide-Taiwo L. O. 2010. Assessment of the Benefits and Constraints of Homegardening in the Neighborhood of the National Horticultural Research Institute, Ibadan, Oyo State. American-Eurasian J. Agric. and Environ. Sci., 7 (4): 478-483. |
[17] | Gautam, R, BR Sthapit and PK Shrestha (eds.) 2006. Homegardens in Nepal: Proceeding of a workshop on "Enhancing the contribution of homegarden to on-farm management of plant genetic resources and to improve the livelihoods of Nepalese farmers: Lessons learned and policy implications", 6-7 August 2004, Pokhara, Nepal. LI-BIRD, Biodiversity International and SDC. |
[18] | Das .T and Das A. K. 2005. Inventorying plant biodiversity in homegardens: A case study in Barak Valley, Assam, North East India. Current Science, Vol. 89, No. 1, 10 July 2005. |
[19] | Chaminda Egodawatta and, Rasika Warnasooriya. 2014 Diversity of tree flora in homegardens in urban proximityof Anuradhapura city, Sri Lanka. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Vol. 3, No. 1, 2014, pp. 34-39. |
[20] | Pandey C. B, Kanak Lata, Venkatesh. A & Medhi R. P. 2006. Diversity and species structure of home gardens in South Andaman. Tropical Ecology 47(2): 251-258. |
[21] | Fernandes, E. C. M. and Nair, P. K. R. 1986. An evaluation of the structure and function of tropical home-gardens. ICRAF. Working paper. No. 38. Nairobi, Kenya. |
APA Style
Melese Mengitu, Daniel Fitamo. (2016). Plant Species Diversity and Composition of the Homegardens in Dilla Zuriya Woreda, Gedeo Zone, SNNPRS, Ethiopia. Plant, 3(6), 80-86. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20150306.14
ACS Style
Melese Mengitu; Daniel Fitamo. Plant Species Diversity and Composition of the Homegardens in Dilla Zuriya Woreda, Gedeo Zone, SNNPRS, Ethiopia. Plant. 2016, 3(6), 80-86. doi: 10.11648/j.plant.20150306.14
AMA Style
Melese Mengitu, Daniel Fitamo. Plant Species Diversity and Composition of the Homegardens in Dilla Zuriya Woreda, Gedeo Zone, SNNPRS, Ethiopia. Plant. 2016;3(6):80-86. doi: 10.11648/j.plant.20150306.14
@article{10.11648/j.plant.20150306.14, author = {Melese Mengitu and Daniel Fitamo}, title = {Plant Species Diversity and Composition of the Homegardens in Dilla Zuriya Woreda, Gedeo Zone, SNNPRS, Ethiopia}, journal = {Plant}, volume = {3}, number = {6}, pages = {80-86}, doi = {10.11648/j.plant.20150306.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20150306.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.plant.20150306.14}, abstract = {Homegardens are one of the most complex and diverse agroforestry systems worldwide and played an important role towards the development of early agriculture and domestication of crops and fruit trees. The study was conducted with an objective of investigating the role of homegardens for improved livelihoods and food security in Dilla Zuriya Woreda. Simple random sampling was used to obtain a study population of 120 households, to whom an interview schedule and an observation checklist was used. The average size of the homegardens of the study area ranges from 250m2 (small) to 2000m2 (large) with mean of 665.42m2. The Shannon Weaver indices of plant species in Chichu, Golla, Bulla and Shigedo homegarden were H’=3.52, H’=3.46, H’=3.34 and H’=3.37 respectively. The dominance index also shows that only a few species dominated the homegardens in Bulla (l=0.056) as compared to Chichu (l=0.048), Golla (l=0.052) and Shigedo (l=0.054) homegardens. The evenness index shows that in Chichu homegardens most of the species are equally abundant (E = 0.45). In total, 75 different plant species with trees (44%), shrubs (20%), herbs (32%) and climbers (4%) were recorded under ten use categories. Of the identified species 40% were food crops, 17.3% were crops used for income, 13.3% were medicinal, 17.3% were plants used as live fence, 20% were used for building and fuel, 10.6% were used for home materials, 4% were used as spices, 5.3% were stimulants, 10.6% were used as ornamentals and 20% plant species were used for shading. The homegaden in the study area were highly diversified with different plant species that provide multiple use for the household.}, year = {2016} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Plant Species Diversity and Composition of the Homegardens in Dilla Zuriya Woreda, Gedeo Zone, SNNPRS, Ethiopia AU - Melese Mengitu AU - Daniel Fitamo Y1 - 2016/01/29 PY - 2016 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20150306.14 DO - 10.11648/j.plant.20150306.14 T2 - Plant JF - Plant JO - Plant SP - 80 EP - 86 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2331-0677 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.plant.20150306.14 AB - Homegardens are one of the most complex and diverse agroforestry systems worldwide and played an important role towards the development of early agriculture and domestication of crops and fruit trees. The study was conducted with an objective of investigating the role of homegardens for improved livelihoods and food security in Dilla Zuriya Woreda. Simple random sampling was used to obtain a study population of 120 households, to whom an interview schedule and an observation checklist was used. The average size of the homegardens of the study area ranges from 250m2 (small) to 2000m2 (large) with mean of 665.42m2. The Shannon Weaver indices of plant species in Chichu, Golla, Bulla and Shigedo homegarden were H’=3.52, H’=3.46, H’=3.34 and H’=3.37 respectively. The dominance index also shows that only a few species dominated the homegardens in Bulla (l=0.056) as compared to Chichu (l=0.048), Golla (l=0.052) and Shigedo (l=0.054) homegardens. The evenness index shows that in Chichu homegardens most of the species are equally abundant (E = 0.45). In total, 75 different plant species with trees (44%), shrubs (20%), herbs (32%) and climbers (4%) were recorded under ten use categories. Of the identified species 40% were food crops, 17.3% were crops used for income, 13.3% were medicinal, 17.3% were plants used as live fence, 20% were used for building and fuel, 10.6% were used for home materials, 4% were used as spices, 5.3% were stimulants, 10.6% were used as ornamentals and 20% plant species were used for shading. The homegaden in the study area were highly diversified with different plant species that provide multiple use for the household. VL - 3 IS - 6 ER -