A Unique Native Prefix in English Language

Branka Mladenovic

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijla.20140202.11

| Peer-Reviewed

A Unique Native Prefix in English Language

Branka Mladenovic

Published in International Journal of Literature and Arts (Volume 2, Issue 2)

Received: 23 December 2013 Published: 28 February 2014

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

History of English derivational system shows that only a few native prefixes, particularly negative, have survived the influx of foreign ones. There is though one native negative prefix, i.e. un- which has not only survived but has continued to be almost equally productive. The results we have got prove our assumption that it is due to different ‘nature’ of prefix un- in comparison with other native negative prefixes.

Published in	International Journal of Literature and Arts (Volume 2, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijla.20140202.11
Page(s)	29-34
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2014. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Derivation, Suffixes, Prefixes, Logical/Practical Meaning

References

[1]	L.Bauer, (1983). English Word Formation. Cambridge: University Press.
[2]	D.Crystal, (2003). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge: University Press.
[3]	R. Djordjevic, (1997). Grammar of English Language (second edition), Belgrade: Author. Gramatika Engleskog jezika (drugo izdanje), Beograd: Autor.
[4]	J.R.C. Hall, (1960). A Concise Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Cambridge: University Press.
[5]	O. Jespersen, (1948). Growth and Structure of the English Language. Oxford: Basil, Blackwell.
[6]	G. Korac, (2000). An Outline of Old English Grammar. Belgrade: The Institute for Foreign Languages.
[7]	G. Korac, (2002). An Outline of Middle English Grammar. Beograd: Filoloski fakultet, Narodna Knjiga.
[8]	A. Lehrer, (2009). "Prefixes in English Word Formation". Folia Linguistica XXIX/1-2 (C), pg. 133-148, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.
[9]	U. Lutzky, (2004). "Negative prefixes in Middle English: a corpus based study of dis-, in-, mis-&un-", Vienna English Working Papers, Vol.13, No.2, 24-52.
[10]	J. at all. March, (2003). "Negative prefixes can be positively confounding". Edit Prosmarketing Communications, 7(7).
[11]	H. Marchand, (1960). The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
[12]	B. Strang, (1970). A History of English. London and Colhester: Methuen&CoLtd.
[13]	J. Wright, and E.M.Wright (1928). An Elementary Middle English Grammar. Oxford: University Press.
[14]	K.E. Zimmer, (1964). "Affixal Negation in English and Other languages: An Investigation of restricted Productivity". Suppl. WORD, 20(2):5.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Branka Mladenovic. (2014). A Unique Native Prefix in English Language. International Journal of Literature and Arts, 2(2), 29-34. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20140202.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Branka Mladenovic. A Unique Native Prefix in English Language. Int. J. Lit. Arts 2014, 2(2), 29-34. doi: 10.11648/j.ijla.20140202.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Branka Mladenovic. A Unique Native Prefix in English Language. Int J Lit Arts. 2014;2(2):29-34. doi: 10.11648/j.ijla.20140202.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijla.20140202.11,
  author = {Branka Mladenovic},
  title = {A Unique Native Prefix in English Language},
  journal = {International Journal of Literature and Arts},
  volume = {2},
  number = {2},
  pages = {29-34},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijla.20140202.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20140202.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijla.20140202.11},
  abstract = {History of English derivational system shows that only a few native prefixes, particularly negative, have survived the influx of foreign ones. There is though one native negative prefix, i.e. un- which has not only survived but has continued to be almost equally productive. The results we have got prove our assumption that it is due to different ‘nature’ of prefix un- in comparison with other native negative prefixes.},
 year = {2014}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - A Unique Native Prefix in English Language
AU  - Branka Mladenovic
Y1  - 2014/02/28
PY  - 2014
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20140202.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijla.20140202.11
T2  - International Journal of Literature and Arts
JF  - International Journal of Literature and Arts
JO  - International Journal of Literature and Arts
SP  - 29
EP  - 34
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2331-057X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20140202.11
AB  - History of English derivational system shows that only a few native prefixes, particularly negative, have survived the influx of foreign ones. There is though one native negative prefix, i.e. un- which has not only survived but has continued to be almost equally productive. The results we have got prove our assumption that it is due to different ‘nature’ of prefix un- in comparison with other native negative prefixes.
VL  - 2
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Branka Mladenovic

Department of Linguistic, Language and Literature, Faculty of Philology, Belgrade University, Serbia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Branka Mladenovic. (2014). A Unique Native Prefix in English Language. International Journal of Literature and Arts, 2(2), 29-34. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20140202.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Branka Mladenovic. A Unique Native Prefix in English Language. Int. J. Lit. Arts 2014, 2(2), 29-34. doi: 10.11648/j.ijla.20140202.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Branka Mladenovic. A Unique Native Prefix in English Language. Int J Lit Arts. 2014;2(2):29-34. doi: 10.11648/j.ijla.20140202.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijla.20140202.11,
  author = {Branka Mladenovic},
  title = {A Unique Native Prefix in English Language},
  journal = {International Journal of Literature and Arts},
  volume = {2},
  number = {2},
  pages = {29-34},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijla.20140202.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20140202.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijla.20140202.11},
  abstract = {History of English derivational system shows that only a few native prefixes, particularly negative, have survived the influx of foreign ones. There is though one native negative prefix, i.e. un- which has not only survived but has continued to be almost equally productive. The results we have got prove our assumption that it is due to different ‘nature’ of prefix un- in comparison with other native negative prefixes.},
 year = {2014}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - A Unique Native Prefix in English Language
AU  - Branka Mladenovic
Y1  - 2014/02/28
PY  - 2014
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20140202.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijla.20140202.11
T2  - International Journal of Literature and Arts
JF  - International Journal of Literature and Arts
JO  - International Journal of Literature and Arts
SP  - 29
EP  - 34
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2331-057X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20140202.11
AB  - History of English derivational system shows that only a few native prefixes, particularly negative, have survived the influx of foreign ones. There is though one native negative prefix, i.e. un- which has not only survived but has continued to be almost equally productive. The results we have got prove our assumption that it is due to different ‘nature’ of prefix un- in comparison with other native negative prefixes.
VL  - 2
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download